JMB-HEADER RAS-JOURNALS EIMB Pleiades Publishing

RUS

             

ENG

YearIMPACT-FACTOR
2025  1,300
2024  1,200
2023  1,500
2022  1,200
2021  1,540
2020  1,374
2019  1,023
2018  0,932
2017  0,977
2016  0,799
2015  0,662
2014  0,740
2013  0,739
2012  0,637
2011  0,658
2010  0,654
2009  0,570
2008  0,849
2007  0,805
2006  0,330
2005  0,435
2004  0,623
2003  0,567
2002  0,641
2001  0,490
2000  0,477
1999  0,762
1998  0,785
1997  0,507
1996  0,518
1995  0,502
Vol 60(2026) N 4 p. 580-588; DOI 10.1134/S0026893326700111 Full Text

T.A. Bessonova1,2,3*, U.D. Kuznetsovae, A.T. Magkaev6, M.S. Gelfand4, M.N. Tutukina1,2,3,4

Effects of Hexuronic Acids on the Expression of Genes for Structural Flagellar Proteins and Regulators of Biofilm Formation in Escherichia coli K-12 MG1655

1Institute for Information Transmission Problems of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Kharkevich Institute), Moscow, 127051 Russia
2Vavilov Institute of General Genetics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 119991 Russia
3Institute of Cell Biophysics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Federal Research Center "Pushchino Scientific Center for Biological Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences," Pushchino, 142290 Russia
4Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Moscow, 121205 Russia
5Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, 117997 Russia
6HSE University, Moscow, 117418 Russia


*tatianabessonova66@gmail.com
Received - 2025-11-11; Revised - 2025-11-27; Accepted - 2025-11-29

Biofilm formation by the Escherichia coli strains leads to development of chronic diseases of the gastrointestinal system and urinary tract. Thus, it is important to reveal the regulatory events resulting in biofilm formation and to find inhibiting agents. Here, we first study the influence of hexuronic acids-compo nents of pectin and intermediates of the Ashwell pathway-on expression of genes with products playing key roles in regulation of the E. coli adhesion to different surfaces and formation of biofilms. Using reverse transcription followed by quantitative PCR, it was demonstrated that D-galacturonic and D-glucuronic acids acted not equally. D-galacturonate activated expression of genes coding for the biofilm formation regulator CsgD and periplasmic chaperone of the type I fimbriae FimC 1.5-3 fold, and more than 10-fold induced expression of SsrS small rNa in biofilms, thus potentially stimulating the ability of E. coli K-12 MG1655 to colonize surfaces. However, D-galacturonate slightly inhibited formation of biofilms. D-glucuronate, in contrast, repressed csgD andfimC2.5-3 fold, as well as the gene of structural flagellinflgK, in the biofilm-forming cells. In line with this, biofilm formation in the presence of D-glucuronate was significantly lowered. It was first shown that 6S small RNA SsrS activates biofilm formation, while overproduction of CsrC small RNA activated this process even in the presence of D-glucuronate. The data obtained allows suggesting that SsrS and CsrC small RNAs played an important role in regulation of the cell switching to formation of biofilms, and hexuronates can be used as modeling agents in clinical practice.

biofilms, hexuronates, Escherichia coli, gene expression, SsrS, CsrC



JMB-FOOTER RAS-JOURNALS