JMB-HEADER RAS-JOURNALS EIMB Pleiades Publishing

RUS

             

ENG

YearIMPACT-FACTOR
2022  1,200
2021  1,540
2020  1,374
2019  1,023
2018  0,932
2017  0,977
2016  0,799
2015  0,662
2014  0,740
2013  0,739
2012  0,637
2011  0,658
2010  0,654
2009  0,570
2008  0,849
2007  0,805
2006  0,330
2005  0,435
2004  0,623
2003  0,567
2002  0,641
2001  0,490
2000  0,477
1999  0,762
1998  0,785
1997  0,507
1996  0,518
1995  0,502
Vol 54(2020) N 2 p. 299-309; DOI 10.1134/S0026893320020107 Full Text

G.F. Kurakin1*, N.P. Lopina1, G.E. Bordina1

Comparative Computational Modeling of Agonist Binding to the Leukotriene Receptors BLT1 and BLT2

1Tver State Medical University, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Tver, 170000 Russia

*Phyzyk@mail.ru
Received - 2019-02-25; Revised - 2019-09-16; Accepted - 2019-09-17

The leukotriene B4 receptors BLT1 and BLT2 are promising targets for the treatment of allergic and inflammatory diseases. However, no working model of ligand binding to either of these receptors has been developed so far. Under the assumption that homologous receptors bind their ligands in a similar way, computational modeling of agonist binding to BLT1 and BLT2 was performed using fully flexible docking in Galaxy 7TM. For both receptors, the carboxyl group of the ligand forms a salt bridge with an arginine residue, while the tail hydroxyl groups form hydrogen bonds with three amino acid residues. The differential specificity of ligands to BLT1 and BLT2 is explained by the replacement of histidine with tyrosine. In BLT1, the histidine residue binds the 5-OH group of the ligand, while the tyrosine residue in BLT2 repels it. The presented models are in agreement with experimental data and may be useful for developing new BLT1- and BLT2-targeted drugs.

leukotriene B4, receptors, BLT1, BLT2, computational modeling, homology, binding mechanism



JMB-FOOTER RAS-JOURNALS