JMB-HEADER RAS-JOURNALS EIMB Pleiades Publishing

RUS

             

ENG

YearIMPACT-FACTOR
2022  1,200
2021  1,540
2020  1,374
2019  1,023
2018  0,932
2017  0,977
2016  0,799
2015  0,662
2014  0,740
2013  0,739
2012  0,637
2011  0,658
2010  0,654
2009  0,570
2008  0,849
2007  0,805
2006  0,330
2005  0,435
2004  0,623
2003  0,567
2002  0,641
2001  0,490
2000  0,477
1999  0,762
1998  0,785
1997  0,507
1996  0,518
1995  0,502
Vol 51(2017) N 1 p. 130-135; DOI 10.1134/S0026893316060200 Full Text

A.K. Velichko1, N.V. Petrova1, S.V. Razin1,2*, O.L. Kantidze1

Comparative analysis of the synchronization methods of normal and transformed human cells

1Institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119334 Moscow, Russia
2Moscow State University, Department of Molecular Biology, 119991 Moscow, Russia

*sergey.v.razin@usa.net
Received - 2016-03-09; Accepted - 2016-04-01

Reactions of genetically identical cells to various exogenous and endogenous stimuli can vary significantly. One of the main factors of this non-genetic cellular heterogeneity is the cell cycle. The most convenient way to study the subcellular processes depending on the cell cycle stage is the synchronization of the cells. Toxic inhibitors of DNA replication and/or mitotic spindle assembly are typically used to synchronize cells. It is important to accurately select the synchronization method for a particular experiment. In this study, we performed a comparative analysis of the synchronization methods of normal and transformed human cells, paying special attention to the accuracy of synchronization and toxicity of the methods used.

cell cycle, synchronization, DNA replication, BrdU, EdU



JMB-FOOTER RAS-JOURNALS